5.038% → 123%
Plan attainment
Plan attainment: 38% before. 123% the month we switched it on: every seller just knew the one thing to fix that week. Spellit gives you growth that survives losing your best seller.
Turn sales conversations into revenue growth
Spellit gives you a weekly plan with the next best actions to save your deals.Fix sales dialogs, know your clients, train new hires, automatically assign tasks to grow. All with proofs and quotes.
Sales calls89 / wk
Meetings63 / wk
Demos27 / wk
Personalised AI
Tuned to your industry, your business and your own methodology.
More than 114 data transformations on every conversation.
4 products
Spellit ActionsWeekly coaching plan: what to fix, what to win back.for sellers & their leadsSpellit Client TruthAutomatic segmentation, buyer pains, fears, motives.for marketing & productSpellit AcademyFast onboarding, tests, tracking, AI customer practice.for new hiresSpellit NotesSummaries and task lists from every meeting, sent by link.for the whole team
Trusted by teams driving real revenue growth
Four products. One revenue growth system.
Try it right here↓ Live interface below — click anything
Turns last week's conversations into this week's plan with next best actions: what each rep fixes, and which deals to win back.Look on conversations from the customer's side: segments, pains, what stops them and what they keep asking for.Fast onboarding — auto-build course from your materials, tests, AI customer role-play practice. Track who is ready to sell.Make decisions actually happen. Turn meetings into a summary + a task list on any language, and send a link to anyone.
ActionsClient TruthStrategic
Reactive
Details
Week of Jul 13Week of Jul 20Week of Jul 27
What happened during the week of Jul 13 – Jul 19, 2026Jul 20 – Jul 26, 2026Jul 27 – Aug 2, 2026
A summary of call quality, deals without a confirmed next step, and team weaknesses. All figures are recalculated weekly.
TeamThe whole companyTeam 1 · 31Team 4 · 49Team 5 · 33
ReviewStrategicReactive
Success score
464438/ 100↗ 3.1 p.p.↘ 2.0 p.p.↘ 6.0 p.p.
How close were conversations to a sale · 384143 rated calls
Conversations analyzed↗ 43814 managers active
Critical errors↘ 29%3 out of 38 calls
Call quality↗ 1.864%quality of the pitch
Talk ratio↗ 1.257%balanced · 61% in range
Trust↗ 2.066%average level
Tone / emotion↗ 0.961%buyer emotion
Conversations analyzed↗ 34115 managers active
Critical errors↗ 211%5 out of 41 calls
Call quality↘ 3.061%quality of the pitch
Talk ratio↗ 1.058%balanced · 58% in range
Trust↘ 3.063%average level · 1 below
Tone / emotion↘ 2.059%buyer emotion
Conversations analyzed↗ 24316 managers active
Critical errors↗ 314%6 out of 43 calls
Call quality↘ 1.459%quality of the pitch
Talk ratio↗ 5.060%balanced · 56% in range
Trust↘ 1.560%average level · 2 below
Tone / emotion↘ 5.757%buyer emotion
Three critical mistakes · what to fix firstranked by payback
click a row — the plan on the right is rewritten for it
Anna Reid · this week3 tasks
FIXby Friday
Book the next step before the call ends
“Shall we lock Thursday 3pm to walk through the rider?”
WATCH10 min
Listen to Lucas's close on the Norvex call
He books the slot while the buyer is still talking — 18:40.
PRACTICE12 min
Practise the closing step on an AI customer
Academy queues a role-play built from your own script.
Lucas Palmer · this week3 tasks
FIXby Friday
Put the budget question before the demo
“Before I show anything — what range are we working inside?”
WATCH6 min
Anna's discovery on the Brightloop call
Budget named at minute four, no surprise at the end — 04:12.
PRACTICE12 min
Practise the price objection
Two attempts failed on the same line last week.
Ethan Wells · this week3 tasks
FIXby Friday
Hold the number until the value is named
“What would make this worth the number for you?”
WATCH4 min
Dana holds the price on the Kestrel Bay call
The buyer names the value himself — 22:05.
PRACTICE8 min
Practice: no discount in the first ten minutes
Level 2 · scored in about thirty seconds.
The team · this week3 tasks
FIXby Friday
Answer the objection in the call, not after
“That's fair — here's how two teams like yours handled it.”
WATCH8 min
Objection playbook: the two answers that work
Both taken from your own won calls.
PRACTICE15 min
Team practice on the top objection
Everyone gets the same scenario this week.
What stopped customers buying
Week of Jul 27 – Aug 2, 2026· 43 calls
What the customer analysis showed
Your buyers decide slowly and in pairs. They fear overpaying, ask how payment works, and want to try before committing. Half postpone the start rather than refuse — they see no reason to act now.
What was stopping customers this week?
What has changed in a week?
−12.6
share of calls with a next step, two weeks running
+17
price doubt, in points, versus last month
−5.8
low-trust calls — the team sounds more certain
TASK FOR THE WEEK · MARKETING
Answer “start later” on the pricing page.
Half your buyers postpone rather than refuse. Their own sentence removes the doubt before the call happens.
Heard in 22 calls
“We'd rather start after the holidays, closer to the new budget.”
TASK FOR THE WEEK · MARKETING
Put the payment explanation one click from the demo form.
The question arrives in half your calls and eats four minutes of every one of them.
Heard in 22 calls
“How does the payment actually work — is it monthly, per person?”
TASK FOR THE WEEK · MARKETING
Give the team the two answers that already work.
Both come from your own won calls — the objection playbook writes itself from them.
Heard in 18 calls
“This is well above what we set aside for this year.”
TASK FOR THE WEEK · MARKETING
Offer the one-team start in the first reply.
Nine of these eight asked for the same shape of pilot. It is already how you sell.
Heard in 8 calls
“Could we try it on one team before we commit?”
TASK FOR THE WEEK · MARKETING
Send these accounts to the self-service story.
This group is not lost — it wants a different first step.
Heard in 8 calls
“We're going the other way this year, more self-service.”
Pains · fears · motives
PAINDecisions stall between two people who both wait for the other.
FEAROverpaying for something the team may not adopt.
MOTIVEBeing the one who brought a working answer, not another tool.
Recoverable deals
Deals where the rep never committed to a next step, but the client still showed interest. They can be returned before they cool off.
This week's funnelAll callsOnly relevant ones
43
Total calls
2456%
With the next step
1944%
No next step
1126% of 43
It can be saved
This week there were 43 calls, 19 without a next step (44%) — of which 11 can still be returned.
Save this week11 deals · 9 managers
Team ▾Manager ▾Status ▾Priority ▾Probability ▾
Naomi Hart · 2 · Anna Reid · 2
Norvex · renewallast touch Aug 4 · demo
The champion asked for the security page and nobody sent it. Nothing was refused — the thread simply stopped.
READY TO SENDwritten from the call
Hi Marta, You asked for the security overview on our last call — here it is, with the part about single sign-on marked. Shall we take fifteen minutes on Thursday at 3pm to close the remaining questions? — Anna
Send itCopyOpen the call
Brightloop · expansionlast touch Aug 6 · call
Two documents were promised on the call and the follow-up went out without them.
READY TO SENDwritten from the call
Hi Daniel, Attaching the two documents I promised on Tuesday: the rollout plan and the pricing breakdown for the second team. Does Friday morning work to agree the start date? — Lucas
Send itCopyOpen the call
Marrowline · new businesslast touch Jul 29 · email
Price was raised at the very end of the demo and the buyer never came back to it.
READY TO SENDwritten from the call
Hi Sofia, I moved too fast to numbers last time. Before we talk price again — what would make this worth it for your team? Happy to redo the demo around that. — Dana
Send itCopyOpen the call
Kestrel Bay · pilotlast touch Aug 1 · meeting
Everything was agreed with the team lead, but the person who signs has not been in a single call.
READY TO SENDwritten from the call
Hi Nina, The pilot scope is agreed with your team. To start on the 1st we need whoever signs it in one short call. Would Wednesday 11am suit them? — Ethan
Send itCopyOpen the call
Team — the week in one line
Worst first, so the coaching hour goes where it pays. Every number opens to the conversation behind it.
RepScoreWith next stepTasks doneWeekCoaching plan
Anna ReidTeam 1 · 11 calls3427%2 / 3↘ 8.1
Ethan WellsTeam 1 · 9 calls4144%1 / 3↘ 3.4—
Dana RuizTeam 5 · 14 calls4752%3 / 3↘ 1.2—
Lucas PalmerTeam 4 · 12 calls5861%3 / 3↗ 4.0—
Elise NavarroTeam 4 · 8 calls6370%3 / 3↗ 6.5—
Anna Reid
Success score
34/ 100↘ 8.1
How much her calls moved toward a sale · 11 scored calls
Conversations analyzed
11
11 calls this week
Critical errors
9%↘ 2.1
in 1 of 11 calls
Call quality
34%↘ 15.9
below the team's 47%
Talk ratio
58%↗ 5.0
monologue in 3 calls
Trust
41%↘ 12.1
1 below par
Tone
88%
no red flags
Strategy · personal priority
What to fix first
Criterion #7 “Next step agreed” · funnel stage: closing. 23 of her calls closed without a date.
When she books the step — 6 of 10 calls end with an agreement. When she skips it — 2 of 10.
Skills map · mastery by funnel stage
Establishing contact3 crit.60%
Seller qualification2 crit.50%
Needs assessment2 crit.27%
Platform presentation5 crit.0%
Objection handling3 crit.18%
Commitment and next steps2 crit.27%
Communication standards2 crit.100%
My deals without a next step
Calls where she did not record a concrete next step — the letter is already written
Norvex · renewal
Brightloop · expansion
Marrowline · new business
Tasks Jul 13 – Jul 19, 2026Jul 20 – Jul 26, 2026Jul 27 – Aug 2, 2026
One to three tasks per seller for the week — what to fix first, with the coaching lesson behind it.
New3In progress0Under review0Confirmed0Returned0
All teams ▾All sellers ▾Any priority ▾
TaskWhoStatus
● high priority · click a task — the coaching panel opens on the right
TaskhighAnna Reid · Team 1
Book the next step before the call ends
▶ Take onDismiss
Why this
Criterion #7 “Next step agreed” · funnel stage: closing
NOW
The call ends with “I'll get back to you” — 23 calls this week closed without a date.
TARGET
The next step is agreed out loud, with a day and a time, before the call ends.
Ready phrases
“Shall we lock Thursday 3pm to walk through the rider?”
“Before we finish — what has to happen on your side for us to start on the 1st?”
Write a comment…Send
TaskhighMarek Palus · Team 4
Ask the budget question before the demo
▶ Take onDismiss
Why this
Criterion #7 “Next step agreed” · funnel stage: closing
NOW
The call ends with “I'll get back to you” — 23 calls this week closed without a date.
TARGET
The next step is agreed out loud, with a day and a time, before the call ends.
Ready phrases
“Shall we lock Thursday 3pm to walk through the rider?”
“Before we finish — what has to happen on your side for us to start on the 1st?”
Write a comment…Send
TaskhighDana Ruiz · Team 5
Hold the number until the value is named
▶ Take onDismiss
Why this
Criterion #7 “Next step agreed” · funnel stage: closing
NOW
The call ends with “I'll get back to you” — 23 calls this week closed without a date.
TARGET
The next step is agreed out loud, with a day and a time, before the call ends.
Ready phrases
“Shall we lock Thursday 3pm to walk through the rider?”
“Before we finish — what has to happen on your side for us to start on the 1st?”
Write a comment…Send
Base status
64clients
Winning48%
Needs work44%
Under threat8%
The deal status here isn’t a funnel summary. It is derived from the conversations analysed, not from the CRM: rejections and follow-ups often happen outside those conversations. The truth about the quality of work sits in the reps’ critical errors, in the Actions section.
All clients
Found : 6
Valentina↗
Under threatInterest 14/30Probability 45%
1)Talks about the child’s overload and the uncertainty of the new school year, and never names what would change her mind.
Margot↗
Under threatInterest 20/30Probability 45%
1)Says plainly that the current format annoys her and asks to switch to something else.
Oona↗
Under threatInterest 6/30Probability 45%
1)The main problem is voiced as unwillingness to pay: the argument returns to price in every answer.
Regina↗
Under threatInterest 19/30Probability 45%
1)Discusses price and ease of payment, wants to see the programme, and states no goal of her own.
Rita Marden↗
Under threatInterest 15/30Probability 45%
1)Through the whole conversation the pain point is never articulated — there is no fear of being left behind.
Norvex↗
Needs workInterest 22/30Probability 60%
1)The security overview was promised on the call and never sent — the thread stopped there.
Found : 4
JoomPulse↗
WinningInterest 27/30Probability 78%
1)Next step booked in the call, the buyer repeated the value back in their own words.
Nordwind↗
WinningInterest 26/30Probability 74%
1)Asked for the rollout plan and named the start date without prompting.
Kelvara↗
WinningInterest 25/30Probability 71%
1)Brought a second stakeholder to the call and set the next meeting themselves.
Algonova↗
WinningInterest 28/30Probability 80%
1)Renewal confirmed verbally; the paperwork is the only step left.
Found : 4
Norvex↗
Needs workInterest 22/30Probability 60%
1)The security overview was promised on the call and never sent — the thread stopped there.
Brightloop↗
Needs workInterest 24/30Probability 62%
1)Two documents were promised, the follow-up went out without them.
Marrowline↗
Needs workInterest 18/30Probability 48%
1)Price was raised at the very end of the demo and the buyer never returned to it.
Kestrel Bay↗
Needs workInterest 21/30Probability 51%
1)Everything is agreed with the team lead; the person who signs has not joined a single call.
Found : 5
Valentina↗
Under threatInterest 14/30Probability 45%
1)Talks about the child’s overload and the uncertainty of the new school year, and never names what would change her mind.
Margot↗
Under threatInterest 20/30Probability 45%
1)Says plainly that the current format annoys her and asks to switch to something else.
Oona↗
Under threatInterest 6/30Probability 45%
1)The main problem is voiced as unwillingness to pay: the argument returns to price in every answer.
Regina↗
Under threatInterest 19/30Probability 45%
1)Discusses price and ease of payment, wants to see the programme, and states no goal of her own.
Rita Marden↗
Under threatInterest 15/30Probability 45%
1)Through the whole conversation the pain point is never articulated — there is no fear of being left behind.
Where your team loses trust
Trust by segmentcompany average 63%
Persona · built from recordings
Operations lead, insurance renewals
Decides with one other person, fears an unused licence more than the price, and needs the renewal to be invisible to their team.
“Last year we paid for seats nobody opened. I can’t repeat that.”
TASK FOR THE WEEK · SALES LEAD
Give the renewals team the usage story first.
Trust in that segment has fallen three weeks running while new business holds — the objection is adoption, not price.
Client personas
Typical client portraits built from real calls — goal, type and a verbatim quote. Click through to the call.
The Careful Renewal Lead42%
Cautious
Goal: Renew without noise; prove last year's licences were used; avoid paying for empty seats.
“Last year we paid for seats nobody opened. I can’t repeat that.”
call #115119 →
The Two-Person Committee38%
Rational
Goal: Bring a working answer to the other decision maker; compare two quotes on the same page.
“I need to show this to my colleague before we decide anything.”
call #115120 →
The Budget-First Buyer27%
Comparator
Goal: Fit this year's budget; understand payment terms before seeing the demo.
“How does the payment actually work — monthly, per person?”
call #115127 →
The Try-One-Team Starter19%
Cautious
Goal: Start small on one team; see results before committing the whole department.
“Could we try it on one team before we commit?”
call #115110 →
The Self-Service Sceptic15%
Rational
Goal: Go the other way this year — more self-service, fewer tools with onboarding.
“We’re going the other way this year, more self-service.”
call #115143 →
AcademyManager
Emma Clarke6371 / 10
Good evening, Emma
Start with the modules and the practice — I'll show you what to work on next.
Not yet ready
Go back to the modules and the trainer on the zones below — this is a normal growth stage.
Remaining to be ready
11 module tests · 2 key practices · capstone role-play
show the listSales skills28 %
Contactno data
Identification23%
Objections: trust and doubt40%
Closing20%
Practise “Closing” — your weakest zone. based on your last 2 rated role-plays
637
points (+2 today)
1
day streak
Level 3637 / 1000
Achievements 1 / 10
Script from memoryLearning plan
Modules, tests and trainings assigned to you.
Day 1
Day 2
Day 3
Theory · from your own script
Welcome to Demo Org
Product in 30 minutes
Target audience and funnel
Language essentials
11 customer segments
Objection bank
Tools and working rules
First-line playbook
Offer and motivation letter
Who we sell to: three segments, and the one question that tells them apart in the first minute.
Where the money is: renewals pay faster than new business, so the funnel is read from the bottom up.
What a good first call ends with: a dated next step, not a “sounds interesting”.
TEST · QUESTION 3 OF 5scored on the server
The buyer says “sounds interesting, let me think”. What ends the call?
Three options, one of them ends the call with a date.+2 points · the coin counter moves top rightTry again — the trainer queues this one for practice.
AI dialogue trainer
Practise in realistic dialogues with an AI counterpart.
Evaluating 1 training…the result will appear in your training history›
Script stages
≈5 minBest: 44%
Stages 10–11 — objection protocol + closing in three attempts
Client: Mara, 38 — liked the presentation, but says “I need to think, I’ll consult my husband.”
We practise: Stages 10–11: isolate the objection, then close on a dated next step.
Pass: Objection isolated without arguing, conversation closed on a specific step with a date.
≈5 minBest: 29%
Stage 3 roleplay — qualification, criteria only
Client: Oona, 38 — warm application, ready to answer questions.
We practise: Stage 3 only: five funding criteria, in order.
Pass: All five criteria clarified verbatim, verdict announced: “You meet the criteria.”
≈5 minBest: 10%
Stages 4–5 — fear and Point A
Client: Alina, 44, tired and withdrawn: answers direct questions briefly and reluctantly.
We practise: Stages 4–5: a question about fear, a pause, and three levels of Point A.
Pass: The client named her real pain; you listened more than you spoke.
Script Trainer
Go through the call stage by stage: full text → anchors only → from memory → practice with a client.
Module 3 · from your own script
Handling the price objection
Three pages, built from the two calls where your team held the number and the buyer said yes anyway.
✓Why the number is questionedread
✓The two answers that work hereread
→What to do when the budget is real2 min
Test · the server holds the answers
The buyer says: “It’s above our budget.”
Pick the reply that keeps the value in front of the number.
A“I can probably do something about the price.”wrong
B“What would make this worth the number for you?”correct
C“Let me check with my manager.”wrong
Level 2 · scored in about thirty seconds
Marta Vidal wants a discount
You speak, the AI customer answers. Every attempt comes back with your own words quoted and the line that works better.
1Attempt one · dropped the price too early44%
2Attempt two · held the number, named the value61%
→Beat your best on the next rungo
Sales skills · last 2 scored role-plays28%
Contactno data
Identification23%
Objections: trust and doubt40%
Closing20%
AIMarta Vidal · procurement leadClient is speaking…
Client:Honestly, your number is well above the other two quotes on my desk.
You:Well… we can probably do something about the price.
●Hold the mic and speak — or type a message…→
Breakdown · 30 seconds later44%
You dropped the price before naming the value. The customer never said the budget was fixed.
SAY THIS INSTEAD
“What would make this worth the number for you?”
Try againBeat your best: 61%
Course content
RegistriesFacts registryTerms registry
All types ▾All statuses ▾All roles ▾Search by title
Sort: by hierarchy, as learners see it
+ Create
Create a new item
Type
Module ▾
Material language
English ▾
To add a translation, create a version with the same key and another language.
Name
Training onboarding course
Key (ID) — unique, latin
module_training_onboarding_course
CancelCreate
AI assistantNew chatPrevious
ImproveQuickFull
Methodologist AI assistant. Ask for help with the current material: improve wording, generate questions, review the material, suggest a structure.
Improve wording in this sectionSuggest 3 questions about this materialWhat can we add for completeness?Rewrite the section more clearly
Ask about this item…→
Emma Clarke · week 2
SummaryModulesTestsFinalsTrainingsActivityDiplomas
ModuleStatusTest scoreReadingCompleted
Welcome to Demo Orgm01_welcomePassed93% · 80%100%Aug 03, 11:17
The product in 30 minutesm02_productPassed97% · 80%100%Aug 03, 14:01
Target audience and funnelm03_audience_funnelPassed97% · 80%100%Aug 03, 15:11
11 customer segmentsm07_segmentsNot started— ——
Objection bankm08_objectionsNot started— ——
Referrals and reviewsm16_referralPassed81% · 80%100%Aug 04, 16:27
Modules passed
4 / 11
reading counted separately
Tests average
64%
threshold 80%
Role-plays scored
3
best 61%
Readiness
Not yet
2 key practices ahead
Upload+ Add task
Search meetings, people or what was said…
‹Aug 10 — Aug 16 2026›Today41 meetingsWeekMonthDay
Mon
10
Daily12:04 · 50 minDemo Org technique12:59 · 61 min+ 2 more
Tue
11
Daily12:00 · 46 minWidget setup15:03 · 40 min+ 1 more
Wed
12
Oliver Roman09:09 · 59 minDaily12:02 · 44 min+ 5 more
Thu
13
Daily12:03 · 24 min+ 11 more
Fri
14
Spellit welcome call09:01 · 19 minDaily11:35 · 25 min+ 3 more
Sat
15
Sun
16
Brightloop · weekly
Connected accounts
GraceAdrianNinaOliver
Analysis parametersReanalysisEdit
English
Participant names
GraceAdrianNinaOliverBusiness Assistant
SummaryTranscriptCosts
Edit manuallyEdit text, add or remove sections
Edit with AICorrect names, translate, reformat…
Topic and goal
Weekly review of the Brightloop rollout: scope of the second team and what has to be signed before September.
Short summary
—The rollout moves to the second team from September, subject to the revised scope.
—Nina asked for the migration plan before signing the annex.
—Pricing for the second team stays as quoted until the end of the quarter.
TASKS AND AGREEMENTS3 with an owner
Send the revised scopeGraceAug 17
Attach the migration planAdrianAug 18
Confirm second-team pricingOliverAug 21
UNRESOLVED · THE ROOM THOUGHT IT AGREED
Who signs the annex — Nina or the legal team?
raised at 31:12, the room moved to pricing
Is the discount inside the pilot or after it?
raised at 44:05, nobody answered out loud
ENESFR+ Add language
v1 / 1CopyDOCXPDF.mdShare
Share summary link
Creates a secure link. Only people with this link can view the summary.
Expires in:1 year ▾Brand:Spellit ▾
Media:Include audioInclude video
Create linkSave current filters
8 queued · 1 done
TaskTypeAssigneeMeetingDeadlinePrioStatusResolution
Send the revised scope to BrightlooptaskGraceBrightloop · weeklytodayin progressadd resolution…
Attach the migration plantaskAdrianBrightloop · weeklyAug 18queuedadd resolution…
Send the security overviewtaskAnnaNorvex · security reviewtodayin progressadd resolution…
Draft the SSO scopetaskDanielProduct syncAug 19queuedadd resolution…
Rewrite the pricing FAQtaskDanaProduct syncAug 22queuedadd resolution…
Name owners for two accountstaskGraceBoard updateAug 18donemade
Publish the new scripttaskMartaNew hires · week 2Aug 19queuedadd resolution…
Who signs the annex?questionunassignedBrightloop · weeklyopenunresolvedneeds an owner
Does SSO go to all plans?questionunassignedProduct syncopenunresolvedneeds an owner
8 queued · 0 done
TaskTypeAssigneeMeetingDeadlinePrioStatusResolution
Send the revised scope to BrightlooptaskGraceBrightloop · weeklytodayin progressadd resolution…
Attach the migration plantaskAdrianBrightloop · weeklyAug 18queuedadd resolution…
Send the security overviewtaskAnnaNorvex · security reviewtodayin progressadd resolution…
Draft the SSO scopetaskDanielProduct syncAug 19queuedadd resolution…
Rewrite the pricing FAQtaskDanaProduct syncAug 22queuedadd resolution…
Publish the new scripttaskMartaNew hires · week 2Aug 19queuedadd resolution…
Who signs the annex?questionunassignedBrightloop · weeklyopenunresolvedneeds an owner
Does SSO go to all plans?questionunassignedProduct syncopenunresolvedneeds an owner
2 queued · 0 done
TaskTypeAssigneeMeetingDeadlinePrioStatusResolution
Send the revised scope to BrightlooptaskGraceBrightloop · weeklytodayin progressadd resolution…
Send the security overviewtaskAnnaNorvex · security reviewtodayin progressadd resolution…
2 queued · 0 done
TaskTypeAssigneeMeetingDeadlinePrioStatusResolution
Who signs the annex?questionunassignedBrightloop · weeklyopenunresolvedneeds an owner
Does SSO go to all plans?questionunassignedProduct syncopenunresolvedneeds an owner
1 queued · 1 done
TaskTypeAssigneeMeetingDeadlinePrioStatusResolution
Send the revised scope to BrightlooptaskGraceBrightloop · weeklytodayin progressadd resolution…
Name owners for two accountstaskGraceBoard updateAug 18donemade
Start with the growth problem you need to solve now.
Fix firstStart withWhat you get
1 / 4 · swipe or tap
01Improve sales performanceSpellit ActionsBest for: CEO, Sales Leaders, RevOpsWhere revenue leaks, and what it costsSilent deals, with the follow-up already writtenA weekly plan per rep: who to coach, on what
02Understand your customersSpellit Client TruthBest for: Marketing, Product, CEOWhy the market says no, in your buyers’ wordsLower CAC — budget goes to leads that convertThe answer to the objection you keep hearing
03Train the team before they sellSpellit AcademyBest for: Sales Enablement, HR, OperationsPractice on an AI customer, not on a live dealWho is ready for live calls, and who don’tA new script live across the team in days
04Speed up execution after meetingsSpellit NotesBest for: everyone who sits in meetingsMeetings become tasks with a name and a dateUnfinished decisions stay visibleThe client gets the recap by link, in their language
Put your own numbers in.
The first three describe your team.
The last two are our assumptions — set them to yours.
5
20
$1,000
60%
10%
Revenue today$171,600
Revenue in deals with no next step$257,400
Revenue with Spellit$197,340+15% with Spellit
What Spellit adds, every month
+$25,740
Won back from deals that stalled without a next step.
Book a demoLive in a week.
Prebuilt CRM connectors, an open API, or just hand us your conversations.
Already built
Anything else · via API
Anything else · via APIYou have a CRM
Ready integrations.
HubSpot, Pipedrive and Kommo are already built; any other CRM goes through our API.
just 1 day
No CRM
The API takes anything.
A custom system, calls in Google Drive, recordings in your telephony — one call with your developer.
up to 3 days
Without integration
Hand us the recordings.
An archive, loose files or a shared folder — we upload it ourselves.
same week
Enterprise deploymentImplementation assistanceOwn transcription tech96% accuracyGDPR-readyEU data processingRole-based accessPersonalization
Enterprise deploymentImplementation assistanceOwn transcription tech96% accuracyGDPR-readyEU data processingRole-based accessPersonalization
Enterprise deploymentImplementation assistanceOwn transcription tech96% accuracy
Enterprise deploymentImplementation assistanceOwn transcription tech96% accuracy
GDPR-readyEU data processingRole-based accessPersonalization
GDPR-readyEU data processingRole-based accessPersonalization
From one improved conversation to real P&L impact.
One conversation moves more than it looks. See how small gains multiply.Follow one real case from a dialog → funnel → to the revenue.
Click any metric to trace its impact from conversation to P&L.Click any metric to trace the impact on P&L
01Impact on dialogue
02Impact on funnel & team
03Impact on P&L
Why 39% became 123% ↘Why 39% became 123%?
39% × 2.19 × 1.44 = 123%
39%revenue vs. plan, before
× 2.19 more closed dealsLead-to-sale 4.2% → 8.7% = 2.07×.Next steps, objection handling and rep performance carried more opportunities to closed-won.The card rounds it to 2–3×.
× 1.44 bigger dealsAverage deal size +44% = 1.44×.Objections answered and stronger reps defend value instead of discounting.
= 123%2.19 × 1.44 = 3.15× revenue.39% × 3.15 = 123% of plan.
One conversation changes everything.
See the demo now. Then try it on yours.
A live demo of our products and a real conversation
about your revenue growth problem.
45 minutes · nothing to prepare
Book a demo