Quality you can prove, not sample.
Every conversation reviewed the same way, and a plan per person instead of a monthly scorecard nobody acts on.
- Fix
- Same question asked in 23 tickets, answered nowhere
- Say
- Put the answer in the help centre and in the first reply
- Because
- “Nobody told us the old link would stop working.”09:27
This is not a replacement for your quality team.
Reviewers stop spending the week scoring and start spending it coaching. The scoring happens on every conversation instead of the handful anyone had time for.
The ticket says resolved and the customer left anyway
Support measures handle time and resolution, and both look fine. What neither measures is the moment the customer decided this was not worth the effort, which happened somewhere in the middle of a call that closed successfully.
A resolved ticket and a kept customer are not the same event.
What changes
All of them, the same way
No sampling, no reviewer drift, no arguing about whose standard applied.
A plan per agent
One thing to fix this week, the words to use, and the moment in their own call where it went wrong.
Rehearsal before the shift
The hard scenario gets practised on an AI customer, not discovered on a live one.
How it works on your conversations
Every screen below is the product itself, running. Try one.
Score every conversation on your own rubric
The standard is built from the quality framework your reviewers already use, in the wording your team already says. Every conversation is scored against it the same way, so a good week and a bad week differ by what happened rather than by who was reviewing.Your quality framework, applied to every conversation instead of a sample.The standard, as your team wrote it
Every check comes from your own methodology. Nothing here was invented by us.
One check from this group
Introduced themselves and named the company within the first minute
How it is decided
Passed if the name and the company are both said out loud before the buyer starts asking questions.
3 of 5 are mandatory at this funnel stage
See the whole team, sorted worst first
The agent who needs the next hour of coaching is already at the top, with the movement since last week beside the name. Reviewer drift disappears, because nobody is deciding by hand which conversations to open.Every agent on one standard, ordered by who to coach first.The week, by person
Sorted worst first. The list already knows who needs the hour.
Point at a row to see what is behind the number
Have a person rule on a contested score
Quality scoring only works when agents believe it. Anyone can challenge an assessment with their reasoning attached, a reviewer decides, and the outcome is visible to the team. A score nobody can argue with is a score the floor quietly ignores.An agent disputes a score. A reviewer rules, and the team sees the outcome.Appeals this month
Anyone can dispute any score. A person decides, and the outcome is visible to the team.
What gets disputed most
- Budget question asked3×
- Objection handled1×
- Next step agreed1×
- Decision maker identified1×
Point at a status to see what it means
Name the frustration behind the tickets
The same question arrives in twenty-three conversations and gets answered twenty-three times by twenty-three people. Counted across the week and quoted, it stops being a run of tickets and becomes one line in the help centre and one line in the first reply.What customers said this week, in the order they said it most.What buyers want this week
Buyer goals from the week’s calls, as a share of everyone who brought it up. This is what the ads should talk about.
«Half my team joined this year and every one of them learns by watching whoever is free.»
Most often this week: Getting new people productive faster (41%)
Requests left without an answer
Everything a buyer asked for and did not get, not only “we don’t have it”. Real product gaps are marked separately.
3× real product gap this week
Aug 12Product gap
[40:35] Buyer: «Can we get this in German for the Austrian team as well?»
The rep said they would check and the call moved on. Nobody checked.
Open conversation →
Aug 11Send documents
[20:37] Buyer: «Could you send over the slides from the presentation?»
The rep said they did not have them to hand. They were never sent.
Open conversation →
Aug 9Product gap
[26:04] Buyer: «Does it connect to the system we already use for tickets?»
The rep answered “not right now”, and the buyer did not ask again.
Open conversation →
Built for how a support team actually works
- Quality sampling
- Reviewers stop spending the week scoring a handful and start spending it coaching, because the scoring already ran on all of them.
- Escalations
- The moment a conversation turned is visible with the sentence that turned it, so a tier-two handover starts from what happened.
- Handle time and resolution
- Both can look healthy on a conversation that lost the customer. What was said sits next to what was measured.
- Help centre gaps
- A question answered repeatedly by people is a page nobody has written yet, counted and quoted.
- Difficult conversations
- The angry caller and the refund request get rehearsed on an AI customer before they reach a live one.
What happens, and when
Week one
Every conversation is read, not the ones flagged by a survey nobody fills in.
Month one
The recurring frustration behind the tickets is named and counted.
Quarter one
Agents rehearse the difficult conversation before it reaches a real customer.
Where to start
Each product is bought on its own. Start with the one that hurts.
Spellit Actions
Start with it!Spellit Academy
Spellit Client Truth
Spellit Notes
See the demo now. Then run it on yours.
A live demo of our products and a real conversation
about your revenue growth problem.