You talk. The tasks assign themselves.

Every agreement becomes a task with an owner and a date.What the room left unsettled stays visible instead of quietly disappearing.

Book a demo45 minutes · nothing to prepare
swipe
Spellit Notes
Notes
Upload+ Add task
Aug 10 — Aug 16 2026Today41 meetingsWeekMonthDay
Mon
10
Daily12:04 · 50 minDemo Org technique12:59 · 61 min+ 2 more
Tue
11
Daily12:00 · 46 minWidget setup15:03 · 40 min+ 1 more
Wed
12
Oliver Roman09:09 · 59 minDaily12:02 · 44 min+ 5 more
Thu
13
Daily12:03 · 24 min+ 11 more
Fri
14
Spellit welcome call09:01 · 19 minDaily11:35 · 25 min+ 3 more
Sat
15
Sun
16
Brightloop · weekly
Monday, August 11, 2026
10:00 – 10:52
52 minutes
Business Assistant · hello@demo-org.example
Connected accounts
GraceAdrianNinaOliver
Analysis parametersReanalysisEdit
English
Participant names
GraceAdrianNinaOliverBusiness Assistant
SummaryTranscriptCosts
Edit manuallyEdit text, add or remove sections
Edit with AICorrect names, translate, reformat…
Topic and goal
Weekly review of the Brightloop rollout: scope of the second team and what has to be signed before September.
Short summary
The rollout moves to the second team from September, subject to the revised scope.
Nina asked for the migration plan before signing the annex.
Commercial terms for the second team stay as quoted until the end of the quarter.
TASKS AND AGREEMENTS3 with an owner
Send the revised scopeGraceAug 17
Attach the migration planAdrianAug 18
Confirm the second-team termsOliverAug 21
UNRESOLVED · THE ROOM THOUGHT IT AGREED
Who signs the annex — Nina or the legal team?
raised at 31:12, the room moved to the commercials
Is the discount inside the pilot or after it?
raised at 44:05, nobody answered out loud
ENESFR+ Add language
v1 / 1CopyDOCXPDF.mdShare
Save current filters
8 queued · 1 done
TaskTypeAssigneeMeetingDeadlinePrioStatusResolution
Send the revised scope to BrightlooptaskGraceBrightloop · weeklytodayin progressadd resolution…
Attach the migration plantaskAdrianBrightloop · weeklyAug 18queuedadd resolution…
Send the security overviewtaskAnnaNorvex · security reviewtodayin progressadd resolution…
Draft the SSO scopetaskDanielProduct syncAug 19queuedadd resolution…
Rewrite the onboarding FAQtaskDanaProduct syncAug 22queuedadd resolution…
Name owners for two accountstaskGraceBoard updateAug 18donemade
Publish the new scripttaskMartaNew hires · week 2Aug 19queuedadd resolution…
Who signs the annex?questionunassignedBrightloop · weeklyopenunresolvedneeds an owner
Does SSO go to all plans?questionunassignedProduct syncopenunresolvedneeds an owner
8 queued · 0 done
TaskTypeAssigneeMeetingDeadlinePrioStatusResolution
Send the revised scope to BrightlooptaskGraceBrightloop · weeklytodayin progressadd resolution…
Attach the migration plantaskAdrianBrightloop · weeklyAug 18queuedadd resolution…
Send the security overviewtaskAnnaNorvex · security reviewtodayin progressadd resolution…
Draft the SSO scopetaskDanielProduct syncAug 19queuedadd resolution…
Rewrite the onboarding FAQtaskDanaProduct syncAug 22queuedadd resolution…
Publish the new scripttaskMartaNew hires · week 2Aug 19queuedadd resolution…
Who signs the annex?questionunassignedBrightloop · weeklyopenunresolvedneeds an owner
Does SSO go to all plans?questionunassignedProduct syncopenunresolvedneeds an owner
2 queued · 0 done
TaskTypeAssigneeMeetingDeadlinePrioStatusResolution
Send the revised scope to BrightlooptaskGraceBrightloop · weeklytodayin progressadd resolution…
Send the security overviewtaskAnnaNorvex · security reviewtodayin progressadd resolution…
2 queued · 0 done
TaskTypeAssigneeMeetingDeadlinePrioStatusResolution
Who signs the annex?questionunassignedBrightloop · weeklyopenunresolvedneeds an owner
Does SSO go to all plans?questionunassignedProduct syncopenunresolvedneeds an owner
1 queued · 1 done
TaskTypeAssigneeMeetingDeadlinePrioStatusResolution
Send the revised scope to BrightlooptaskGraceBrightloop · weeklytodayin progressadd resolution…
Name owners for two accountstaskGraceBoard updateAug 18donemade

Everyone left the meeting sure it was agreed

Six people, fifty minutes, four topics. Somebody said "let us come back to the commercials" and nobody did. Somebody agreed to send the deck, and it was not clear whether that meant today or after the holidays. The recording exists. The recap says the meeting was productive.

Nobody lied. The room just never said the last sentence out loud.

This is not another transcriber

Transcription stopped being the hard part years ago. Here is what the difference looks like in practice.

A transcript tool gives you
A wall of text you have to read
A summary somebody still turns into work
Highlights, chosen by how loud a sentence was
A file per meeting, and a folder that grows
Spellit Notes gives you
Tasks with an owner and a date, from the sentence that agreed them
The decisions the room never actually closed
A link for people who will never have an account
Search across every meeting, not inside one

What happens after the call ends

Recording a meeting is not the hard part, and it has not been for years. The hard part is the week that follows.

You talk. The tasks assign themselves.

Execution

Every agreement becomes a task.

With an owner and a date, taken from the sentence where it was agreed. Not a bullet list somebody has to read and retype.

Awareness

Unfinished decisions stay visible.

The things the room skipped past are marked as unsettled, so they come back before they cost something.

Forty-one meetings in one week

One tidy summary proves nothing, because everybody can produce one. Here is the week a real team actually has, with every conversation read, and the ones without a recording still visible.

A week of meetings, all of them read

Forty-one conversations in five days. Every one of them comes back as a summary, a set of tasks and a list of what was left open.

41 meetings

Mon 10

Tue 11

Wed 12

Thu 13

Fri 14

Sat 15

    Sun 16

      Vantar: renewal

      analysed

      Renewal agreed in principle; the security review is the only thing standing between now and signature.

      • 5 in the room
      • 6 tasks
      • 2 left open

      One meeting, two outcomes

      What a sentence turns into, and what happens to the one nobody answered.

      Quarterly review with Verity Group

      Tuesday · 51 minutes · 6 people

      Marcus Webb12:04

      I can get you the numbers from the Lyon team by end of week, but I will need Sofia to pull them.

      Task

      Send the Lyon team figures

      Marcus WebbFriday

      Nora Bennett33:41

      We should probably revisit the rollout order at some point, it feels off to me.

      Left open

      Rollout order was questioned and never settled

      Raised once, agreed by nobody, followed by a change of subject. No owner, no date, and everyone left thinking it was handled.

      What it actually does

      01/05

      You talk. The tasks assign themselves

      Every agreement in the conversation turns into a task with a name and a date on it. The name comes from who agreed, the date from what was said, and the task carries the sentence it came from, so nobody has to argue about what was meant.Owner and date come from the conversation, not from a formEach task keeps the sentence it was born inNothing is retyped, so nothing is lost in retyping

      Meeting record

      Pilot scope and launch conditions

      Thursday, July 9 · 09:00 – 09:36 · 36 minutes

      In the room: Maria Feldt, Oleg Rahn, Tomas Prieto · Summary available in EN, DE

      What was discussed

      • 04:2806:17Why the first attempt gave weak results

        The trial ran on a generic checklist instead of the standard this team actually uses, and on ten calls rather than a normal week. Both sides agreed the comparison was not fair to either side.

      • 11:5220:39Shape of the pilot

        One team, three weeks, the standard written from their own recordings. Cost is calculated after the scope is fixed, not before.

      • 24:5433:49What the team gets to see

        Weekly plan per rep, the deals that went quiet, and progress against the same items week over week. Nothing that names a person outside their own manager.

      Tasks and agreements · Open a task to see the sentence it came from

      TaskOwnerDue

      View in tasks hub →

      02/05

      Unfinished decisions stay visible

      This is the part that surprises people. The room moves on, the topic never closes, and everyone leaves thinking it did. Spellit Notes marks what was raised and never settled, and those lines outlive the meeting they came from.Marked as unsettled, not as somebody task: this is about seeing, not about workloadCarried forward, so the same open question does not need to be remembered by a personOpens into the moment it was raised

      Raised and never settled

      Not tasks. Questions that came up, moved on, and left the room thinking they were closed.

      • Every date discussed since May assumes this is done. Nobody has named the person who does it.

        Where it came up

        1. May 14First call22:10«We will need to run it past security at some point, obviously.»
        2. Jun 3Scope call09:47«Security is a formality for us, it never blocks anything.»
        3. Jul 9Pilot conditions31:02«So we start in August, assuming the security thing is fine, right?»
      • Two people have said “we”. Neither has said “I”.

      • Raised once, answered with a joke, never returned to.

      03/05

      Send it by link, in their language

      The client was not in your system and never will be. They get a link that opens in a browser, in the language they read, with the recording attached if you want it there. The link stops working when you say it does.No account, no invite, no access requestExpiry set by you: a day, a week, until the deal closesThe summary reads in their language, not yours

      Share summary link

      Creates a link that opens in a browser. No account, no invite, no access request.

      Summary language

      Link expires in

      The recording opens with the summary.

      The link they get

      What they open · English

      Pilot scope and launch conditions

      Agreed: one team, three weeks, the standard written from your own recordings. The exact cost follows once the scope is fixed. Open on your side: who signs off the security review.

      7 days · ▶ recording attached

      04/05

      Search across every meeting you sat in

      Not search across one recording: search across the year. What did that client say about the integration in March. Who was in the room when it was agreed. Answers come with the meeting, the moment and the words.

      Search across every meeting you sat in

      3 found in 3 meetings

      Try:

      • Pilot conditionsJul 9Maria Feldt31:02

        So we start in August, assuming the security review is fine, right?

      • Scope callJun 3Tomas Prieto09:47

        Security is a formality for us, it never blocks anything.

      • First callMay 14Maria Feldt22:10

        We will need to run it past security at some point, obviously.

      Not a link to an hour-long recording. The sentence, the meeting and the minute.

      05/05

      Who sees what is a setting, not a promise

      Some meetings are for the team, some are for two people, some are for the record. Visibility is set per meeting, and it is visible to everyone what mode a meeting is in.

      Who sees what is a setting

      Set per meeting. Everyone in the room can see which mode the meeting is in, because a quiet privacy setting is worse than none.

      This meeting is set toPeople in the room

      Everyone who attended gets the summary, the tasks and the search. Nobody else does.

      Someone who was not there: Sees the meeting title and who attended. Not the content.

      It knows who was in the room

      Not the names from the calendar invite. Who each of them turned out to be in this particular conversation, and what they left owning.

      Who was in the room, and who each of them turned out to be

      Nobody typed any of this in. Roles come from what people said and what they were asked, which is why the same person can hold a different role in a different meeting.

      Discovery call: Vantar evaluates the platform

      Tuesday, March 17 · 62 minutes · 6 people

      Topic and purpose First call with a multi-language sales team: team structure, data security, CRM integration and commercial terms.

      Oliver Hayes

      Our side

      What they turned out to be Ran the meeting, introduced everyone and kept the agenda. Did not take a single decision: his job here was to make the room work.

      Left the meeting owning

      • Send the summary and the example report by Thursday

      From the conversation

      «Let me park the commercials for ten minutes so security gets a proper answer first.»

      00:04:11

      A year of promises, in one list

      This is where a note-taker ends and a system of record begins. Meetings finish; the work they created does not.

      Everything anyone agreed to, in one list

      Meetings end. The work does not. Every task and every unanswered question from every meeting lands here, with the conversation it came from attached.

      • 1,140tasks and questions
      • 312meetings behind them
      • 61questions still open

      Saved views

      All tasks and questions across every meeting this month.

      TaskSend the security documentation and the data processing terms to VantarVera SandovalVantar: discoveryToday

      TaskWrite down the export format their engineers asked forAdrian BellKestrel Labs: technical reviewThursday

      QuestionWho signs off the scoring standard before it goes to the team?unassignedWeekly standupnot set

      TaskPrepare the personalised quotation for VantarVera SandovalVantar: discoveryFriday

      QuestionDo we hold the renewal until the security review closes, or run both?unassignedVantar: renewalnot set

      TaskSend the written quote to WestwindOliver HayesWestwind: commercial terms5 days ago

      QuestionWhat counts as "done" for the security review on their side?unassignedVantar: security follow-upnot set

      TaskConfirm the account owner on Mirado’s sideOliver HayesWelcome call: Mirado2 days ago

      TaskOffer a call with an existing customer in the same marketVera SandovalVantar: discoveryNext week

      TaskShare example reports from the tool they used beforePetra LangVantar: discoverynot specified

      What each person gets

      The person running the meeting

      Stop taking notes and actually run the room. The summary, the decisions and the tasks are waiting when it ends.

      Everyone who attended

      See what you own from every meeting you sat in, in one list, with the sentence you agreed to.

      Everyone who did not

      Read a meeting in two minutes instead of watching fifty, and see what was left open in it.

      What it takes to run this across a company

      Spellit Notes is bought by one team and ends up used by everyone. These are the parts nobody asks about in the first demo and everybody asks about in the second.

      01/03

      People join by their work email, not by invitation

      A domain is connected once and everybody on it can sign in. No admin sits in the middle handing out seats, and nobody at your company has to remember to remove a leaver: the domain answers that question.Sign-in by a code to a work address: no password to loseWhole domains, not seat-by-seat invitationsWho has access is derived, not maintained by hand
      02/03

      Who can see a meeting is set per meeting

      Some conversations are for the team, some for two people, some for the record. The mode is visible to everyone in the room, so nobody has to guess whether the one-to-one they just had is now company reading.Three modes, chosen per meeting, changeable after the factThe mode is shown, not hidden in settingsA shared link expires on a date you set, and stops working when it does
      03/03

      Every action leaves a record

      Who opened a meeting, who shared it, who changed the summary, who removed a recording. Not because anybody is being watched, but because the first serious question from a security team is what happens when something goes wrong.A full event log, per organisationUsage visible per team: what is actually being used, not what was boughtRecordings collected the way your team already makes them, with no bot joining the call

      What it moves

      100%

      of promises get an owner

      8x

      faster execution

      2x

      faster decisions

      +10%

      win rate on active deals

      What it takes to start

      01

      No bot joins the call

      Cloud recordings are collected on their own. Nothing changes in how the team runs a meeting, and nobody has to admit a robot into the room.
      02

      Works from the first meeting

      There is no training period and no setup of what counts as a decision. The first recorded meeting comes back as a summary with tasks.
      03

      The team keeps its own tools

      Tasks live here, but they carry the meeting behind them. Nobody has to move their work into a new place to see what they owe.

      See the demo now. Then run it on yours.

      A live demo of our products and a real conversation about your revenue growth problem.

      45 minutes · nothing to prepare
      Book a demo